Rma Military - Revolutionary Military Warfare (RMA) is a theory of how warfare has changed over time. RMA is based on the marriage of new technologies with the concepts of organizational reform and operational innovation. The result is often characterized as a new form of warfare. There have been several RMAs over the past century.
An example of RMA is the mechanization of warfare, which began in World War I with the development of air forces, aircraft carriers, submarines and armored fighting vehicles. From these advances in technology came an independent air force, strategic bombing, and massive popular movements. Another was the invention of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles, and new organizations and threats such as the now-defunct Strategic Air Command emerged. In the 1970s, the advent of information technology and the continuation of high-performance computing were based on RMA, mainly based on intelligence and precision tools. The 1991 Persian Gulf War and 2003 Operation Iraqi Freedom are considered important examples of this RMA.
Rma Military
According to dialectical theory, all revolutions produce counter-revolutions. Definitive strike countermeasures have been developed in the form of counter/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities. These included sophisticated air defenses, long-range precision fire and weapon systems such as unmanned vehicles. More importantly, A2/AD countermeasures seek to attack sensors, networks, and command and control systems using new warfare tools – electronic and cyber warfare, especially in areas such as space. Clearly based on the strike revolution.
Riverside Preparatory Academy
Another new RMA may come soon. It is primarily a function of the proliferation of sensors and so-called smart devices, the creation of increasingly large, complex and sophisticated information networks and the increasing potential in automated systems and artificial intelligence. The first step in this revolution, now evident in the business world and in our personal lives, is the rise of the Internet of Things. But it is the marriage of ubiquitous data collection, virtually unlimited data storage, advanced computational analytics, and high-speed global communications that will truly revolutionize the world.
This emerging RMA is also motivated by addressing A2/AD challenges and taking more advantage of the opportunities presented by new technologies and operational concepts. Electronic and cyber "weapons" can be used both offensively and defensively. Sensors and weapons from all domains of warfare (land, air, sea, outer space, and cyberspace) can be used by others.
The current overall concept that encompasses all aspects of the new RMA is Multi-Domain Battle (MDB). Although MDB's approach to future warfare is still evolving, a reasonable definition of it can be found in the US Army Training and Doctrine Command's "Multidomain Battle: The Evolution of Joint Arms for the 21st Century 2025-2040". Coordinates the movement of friendly forces across domains, environments, and capabilities in time and physical space to achieve specific objectives in combat, such as before and after competitive combat. The key to MDB operation is something called "coupling". This is defined in the same document:
... the simultaneous integration of features and functions (lethal and non-lethal, both within domains and across domains) in time and space. Friendly forces achieve victory through integration, using multi-domain operations to create physical, virtual, and cognitive windows of superiority to conduct cross-domain maneuvers and fires on target.
Randolph Macon Academy
The US Air Force may be the furthest along with the services in evaluating the impact of the new RMA and developing a way to implement the MDB. He rightly concluded that the key to success in future conflicts is multi-domain command and control (MDC2). This new concept is central to achieving integration. US Air Force Chief of Staff General David Goldfein has announced MDC2 as one of his top three mission areas. According to General Goldfein, the MDC2 consists of three elements: exceptionally high situational awareness, rapid decision making, and the ability to direct forces across domains and missions through continuous feedback.
MDC2 envisions a future in which information is gathered from a network of sensors, platforms, and even weapons, and that information can be quickly synthesized into dynamic intelligence and shared with all Air Force components, services, and the intelligence community. With the right information at the right time, a commander can track both friendly and enemy forces, deploy appropriate weapons or effects on targets in each area, and respond in time. MDC2 also develops tactics, techniques and procedures for the offensive and defensive employment of advanced capabilities in electronic and cyber warfare to reach targets around the world in minutes.
The Internet empowers individuals so that they can access more information, make better decisions and control their environment. MDC2 does the same for the Air Force. The Air Force understands that MDC2 will change the way it organizes, how it conducts operations, and the resources it uses to succeed. General James M. Holmes, chairman of the Air Combat Command, described the impact of MDC2 on his service's decision-making process:
"There's one piece of hardware we work with, but there's another piece of it: empowering people to use their knowledge, skills and experience to make the best decisions." Distributed decision-making is also useful in countering the efforts of adversaries to disrupt or block friendly communications. The Air Force is expected to create a special expertise organization to develop the organization, procedures and training needed to implement MDC2.
Rma The Barracks Pre Ww1 Military Gale & Polden Ltd Photo Postcard
Ultimately, the Air Force's MDC2 will need to be compatible with other service command and control concepts being developed for this new RMA. This "meta" version of MDC2 must reconcile the inherent tension between a set of systems and capabilities that can operate in any sector and in any sector, and the inherent singular sector focus of traditional military services. As cyber-conflicts and information operations seem to be common features of peaceful conflicts between enemies, MDC2 must operate under short-war and multiple-engagement rules.
Daniel Gore, Ph.D., is vice president of the Lexington Institute, a public policy research think tank. Gore has a background in the public sector and the United States federal government, most recently serving as a member of the Department of Defense transition team in 2001. You can follow him on Twitter @dgoure and Lexington Institute @LexNextDC. Read his full bio here. The concept of a "revolution in military affairs" has created a sensation in recent years, because it could create a new phase in the conduct of wars. The importance of the RMA is likely to increase in the coming decades of great power rivalry and proxy wars in Eurasia and neighboring countries. Therefore, it is worth spending some time on this concept.
In 1992, the Office of Net Assessment of the US Department of Defense published a report entitled The Coming Military-Technological Revolution - The Military Revolution. This concept is not new. By the 1970s, Soviet military theorists heralded the arrival of what they described as the third wave of the 20th century's military-technological revolution. The first wave was the mechanization of warfare - the use of aviation and chemical weapons in the First World War. When this phase matured during the Second World War, it included the German "power.
.
The Culture Of Military Innovation: The Impact Of Cultural Factors On The Revolution In Military Affairs In Russia, The Us, And Israel.
The second wave came with the development of ballistic missiles and atomic weapons. It grew in the 1970s with the achievement of a nuclear balance between the United States and the Soviet Union. The third wave of technological revolution combined reconnaissance and remote sensing into a unified and comprehensive reconnaissance system, including precision-guided munitions, sensors and long-range radars, computerized communication systems, and situational control.
Marshal Nikolai Ogarkov, who served as Soviet Chief of Staff from 1977 to 1984, found that the development of precision, non-nuclear destruction systems could greatly increase the strike potential and make these systems more effective. Nuclear weapons. It was in this sense that the Soviet Union coined the term "reconnaissance striking site". In 1997, Andrew Marshall, the longtime head of the Office of Cybersecurity, said the Soviets were right to think these capabilities would revolutionize the way they waged war.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise of asymmetric warfare, RMA declined in the United States in the 1990s and early 2000s. But the technological revolution continues. Marshall and ONA compared America's actions in the Gulf War with the introduction of British tanks
Restaurants rice, rice military townhomes for sale, rice military houston, homes for sale rice military houston, rice military homes for sale, rice military homes, rice military apartments, rice military rentals, rice military houston tx, rice military, rice military apartments houston, rice military houston zip code
0 Comments